Managing Fear examines the growing use of risk assessment as it relates to preventive detention and supervision schemes for
offenders perceived to be at a high risk of re-offending, individuals with severe mental illness, and suspected terrorists.
It outlines a number of legislative regimes in common law countries that have broadened 'civil' (as opposed to criminal) powers
of detention and supervision. Drawing on the disciplines of criminology and social psychology, it explores how and why such
schemes reflect a move towards curtailing liberty before harm results rather than after a crime has occurred. Human rights
and ethical issues concerning the role of mental health practitioners in assessing risk for the purposes of preventive detention
and supervision are explored, and regimes that require evidence from mental health practitioners are compared with those that
rely on decision-makers' notions of 'reasonable belief' concerning the risk of harm. Case studies are used to exemplify some
of the issues relating to how governments have attempted to manage the fear of future harm.
This book aims to educate mental health practitioners in the law relating to preventive detention and supervision schemes
and how the legal requirements differ from clinical assessment practices; examine the reasons why there has been a recent
renewal of preventive detention and supervision schemes in common law countries; provide a comparative overview of existing
preventive detention and supervision schemes; and analyse the human rights implications and the ethics of using forensic risk
assessment techniques for preventive detention and supervision schemes.