What Animals Mean in the Fiction of Modernity
«
"Remarkable depth and breadth in its engagement with critical discussions of animals in modern fiction".
- Susan McHugh in Society & Animals 17.4 (2009): 363-7
"An essential book for anyone involved in Animal Studies and everyone concerned with animals in literature".
- Marion Copeland in Humanimalia 1.1 (September 2009)
"A magisterial reading of Moby-Dick appears in What Animals Mean in the Fiction of Modernity alongside compelling studies of Gulliver's Travels, Robinson Crusoe, Frankenstein, a host of twentieth-century novels, and critical analyses of Wells and Lawrence ...".
- Robert McKay in The Minnesota Review issue 73-4 (2010)
»
Examines the function of animals and animal representations in four classic narratives: "Robinson Crusoe", "Gulliver's Travels", "Frankenstein" and "Moby-Dick". This title explores how these stories have been re-worked, in ways that reflect shifting social and environmental forces, by later novelists. Les mer
Examines the function of animals and animal representations in four classic narratives: "Robinson Crusoe", "Gulliver's Travels", "Frankenstein" and "Moby-Dick". This title explores how these stories have been re-worked, in ways that reflect shifting social and environmental forces, by later novelists.
Detaljer
- Forlag
- Routledge
- Innbinding
- Innbundet
- Språk
- Engelsk
- Sider
- 256
- ISBN
- 9780415358385
- Utgivelsesår
- 2008
- Format
- 22 x 14 cm
Anmeldelser
«
"Remarkable depth and breadth in its engagement with critical discussions of animals in modern fiction".
- Susan McHugh in Society & Animals 17.4 (2009): 363-7
"An essential book for anyone involved in Animal Studies and everyone concerned with animals in literature".
- Marion Copeland in Humanimalia 1.1 (September 2009)
"A magisterial reading of Moby-Dick appears in What Animals Mean in the Fiction of Modernity alongside compelling studies of Gulliver's Travels, Robinson Crusoe, Frankenstein, a host of twentieth-century novels, and critical analyses of Wells and Lawrence ...".
- Robert McKay in The Minnesota Review issue 73-4 (2010)
»