Problems of the Hegelian Dialectic
In this book, I deal with some fundamental
problems of the Hegelian dialectic. For this purpose, I take a middle course between total scepticism, which considers dialectic
as a devastator sophistry with no respect even for the non-contradiction principle, and authoritarian dogmatism, which claims
to solve any question with the magic wand of the Hegelian Aufhebung. That is, I decide to be critical, defining concepts anew,
bringing out sources, determining conditions of possibility and fields of validity, accepting or rejecting when necessary.
Following G. R. G. Mure's thinking, from an inner point of view I examine whether, in carrying out his work, Hegel remains
faithful to the different principles he proclaims, and I find substantial deviations. And, following W. Becker's thinking,
from an external point of view, that is, from a formal, empirical or existential contemporary angle, I try to determine the
extent to which we may legitimately talk about the fruitfulness of Hegelian dialectic. In this way, I reconstruct Hegel's
thought so that it may become acceptable to us-readers of the twentieth-century-as intelligible and coherent as possible.
I conclude that dialectic, as a logic of human reality, has to be grasped and expressed from the viewpoint of the particular
historical individual, in constant interaction with the cultural environment of his or her time. Using this approach, I investigate
the questions at issue from Hegel's Logic point of view.
Introduction: For both a Formal and a
of Dialectic.- One Dialectical Identity, Difference and
Contradiction.- Two The Problem of the Beginning.- Three The
Problem of the end.- Four The Problem of Matter and Nature.- Five the Antinomy of Language.- Six Dialectical Explanation.-
Notes.- Analytical table of contents.- Explanatory glossary.- Index of Names.- Index of Subjects.
Springer Book Archives