«

"In Righting Health Policy, MacDougall argues that since bioethics addresses questions of law and policy its discussions should be informed by political philosophy, especially Kantian political philosophy. MacDougall's defense of this revolutionary view is careful, scholarly, and persuasive--and given the importance of Kantian theory in bioethics, must be taken seriously by all who work in this field."

»

James Stacey Taylor, The College of New Jersey

«

"Much of bioethics is deeply engaged in biopolitics. Yet, as D. Robert MacDougall argues, all too often its political aspirations lack any solid intellectual foundation. Righting Health Policy: Bioethics, Political Philosophy, and the Normative Justification of Health Law and Policy offers an engaging critique of the field, exploring ways in which philosophical analysis regarding the legitimate function of government is largely absent from major works on healthcare policy and bioethical methodology. The result is an important conceptual geography regarding the role of careful political philosophy for bioethics, including application to such topics as the distribution of healthcare, research on human subjects, organ transplantation, and informed consent."

»

Mark J. Cherry, St. Edward's University

«

"This book should be read by any bioethicist who wants to recommend change in laws, regulation, or public policy. It shows convincingly that such recommendations require engagement with deep issues in political philosophy and cannot be made on the basis of ethical analysis alone. In the detailed analysis it also shows that bioethicists have often appropriated the ethics of famous philosophers while completely ignoring their political philosophy leading to unacknowledged inconsistencies."

»

Søren Holm, University of Manchester

«

"D. Robert MacDougall has done us all a service with this thought-provoking and carefully argued examination of the role political philosophy should play in bioethics and the way that failing to engage with political philosophy impoverishes and foreshortens bioethical argument. His treatment of Kantian themes is particularly welcome, as bioethics has tended to overlook or downplay the value of Kantian arguments. He shows how illuminating these can be, particularly in debates about organ transplantation and markets in organs. This is an important contribution to bioethics and to thinking about public policy for biomedicine."

»

Richard Ashcroft, City Law School