Great Paradox of Science
Why Its Conclusions Can Be Relied Upon Even Though They Cannot Be Proven
«Philosophers and historians have tackled these issues through many great texts and resources, but Singham reverses the direction of this conversation. This is an enjoyable read, and the contents are a valuable source of information for anyone interested in learning about the role of science in society.»
Daniel Deen, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Concordia University
Science has revolutionized our lives and continues to show inexorable progress today. It may seem obvious that this must be because its theories are steadily getting better and approaching the truth about the world. Les mer
551,-
Innbundet
Sendes innen 21 dager
Science has revolutionized our lives and continues to show inexorable progress today. It may seem obvious that this must be because its theories are steadily getting better and approaching the truth about the world. After all, what could science be progressing toward, if not the truth? But scholarship in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science offers little support for such a sanguine view.
Those opposed to specific conclusions of the scientific community-nonbelievers in vaccinations, climate change, and evolution, for example-have been able to use a superficial understanding of the nature of science to sow doubt about the scientific consensus in those areas, leaving the general public confused as to whom to trust, with damaging effects for the health of individuals and the planet.
The Great Paradox of Science argues that to better counter such anti-science efforts requires us to understand the nature of scientific knowledge at a much deeper level and dispel many myths and misconceptions. It is the use of scientific logic, the characteristics of which are elaborated on in the book, that enables the scientific community to arrive at reliable consensus judgments in which the public can retain a high degree of confidence. This scientific logic is applicable not just in
science but can be used in all areas of life. Scientists, policymakers, and members of the general public will not only better understand why science works: They will also acquire the tools they need to make sound, rational decisions in all areas of their lives.
Those opposed to specific conclusions of the scientific community-nonbelievers in vaccinations, climate change, and evolution, for example-have been able to use a superficial understanding of the nature of science to sow doubt about the scientific consensus in those areas, leaving the general public confused as to whom to trust, with damaging effects for the health of individuals and the planet.
The Great Paradox of Science argues that to better counter such anti-science efforts requires us to understand the nature of scientific knowledge at a much deeper level and dispel many myths and misconceptions. It is the use of scientific logic, the characteristics of which are elaborated on in the book, that enables the scientific community to arrive at reliable consensus judgments in which the public can retain a high degree of confidence. This scientific logic is applicable not just in
science but can be used in all areas of life. Scientists, policymakers, and members of the general public will not only better understand why science works: They will also acquire the tools they need to make sound, rational decisions in all areas of their lives.
Detaljer
- Forlag
- Oxford University Press Inc
- Innbinding
- Innbundet
- Språk
- Engelsk
- ISBN
- 9780190055059
- Utgivelsesår
- 2020
- Format
- 16 x 24 cm
Anmeldelser
«Philosophers and historians have tackled these issues through many great texts and resources, but Singham reverses the direction of this conversation. This is an enjoyable read, and the contents are a valuable source of information for anyone interested in learning about the role of science in society.»
Daniel Deen, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Concordia University
«[This] is a deep and thoughtful attack on the fundamental issue of how science works. I use the word 'attack' deliberately, for the central theme of his book is a devaluation of the concept of truth....These are fighting words indeed, and they require the persuasive support of the careful and detailed arguments that form the bulk of this valuable book. The writing is clear and direct and is tailored to an audience that does not necessarily have any science training. ... [Singham] deserves our whole-hearted thanks for challenging us to confront our previous assumptions, and for doing so by means of such a thoroughly enjoyable and readable book.»
Philip L. Taylor, American Journal of Physics
«...Singham's book offers many interesting and challeng-ing thoughts that can help to illuminate important aspects of scientific knowledge production. The author does a great job in conveying highly intricate arguments and ideas in an accessible and enjoyable fashion using many illustrative examples from the history of science. Many readers will walk away from this book with an increased curiosity for philosophical questions about science and a better sense for the importance of a refined understanding of the role of science in society.»
Karim Bschir, Metascience
«An engaging writer who exhibits a genuine passion for the subject and an expansive knowledge of the history of science. He has a good way of conveying to the layperson the folly of attacking scientific claims because they are the result of 'just theories' and provides needed 'talking points' for when the readers encounter science deniers.»
BMargaret A. Cuonzo, Professor of Philosophy and Associate Dean of Conolly College of Liberal Arts a
Kunders vurdering
Skriv en vurdering
Oppdag mer
Bøker som ligner på Great Paradox of Science:
Ny!